Adv. No. 23-03026 (Southern District of Illinois)
Case No. 23-30045 (Southern District of Illinois)
Seven of eight counts of fourth amended complaint filed by Chapter 11 Debtor against creditor and related entity dismissed with prejudice. The Debtor asserted claims for breach of contract, equitable subordination, tortious interference with business expectancy, tortious interference with contract, negligent interference with business expectancy, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss all counts. Only the breach of contract claim survived. The equitable subordination claim was dismissed for failure to plausibly allege harm to the Debtor's creditor body. The Debtor's state common law and statutory claims were governed by Maryland state law based on a choice-of-law contract provision, and the Debtor failed to plausibly set forth allegations that were actionable under applicable law. Dismissal was with prejudice based on the time and number of opportunities the Debtor had been given to set forth actionable claims with little improvement and at significant cost to the Defendants. The Court also found that amendment of some of the dismissed counts would be futile and that, in any event, the Debtor did not ask for an opportunity to amend further in the event of dismissal.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012